ACM Policy Award
USA - 2025
citation
For contributions to technology policy, particularly on electronic voting, copyright, consumer protection, and artificial intelligence
Over more than two decades, Professor Felten has helped shape policy on electronic voting, copyright, consumer protection, privacy, encryption, and artificial intelligence. His security analysis of electronic voting systems fundamentally shifted the national understanding of technological risks in democracy. Furthermore, his research into digital rights management (DRM) exposed the "chilling effects" that the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) can have on legitimate scientific inquiry. His scholarship and public engagement consistently translated technical realities into terms that policymakers could act upon. These achievements represent a rare combination of policy innovation, sustained engagement, and broad influence on computing policy.
Felten’s contributions have been distinguished not only by their substance, but also by the institutions and communities he has built. At Princeton, he founded the Center for Information Technology Policy and helped establish a model for rigorous, interdisciplinary work linking computing, law, and public affairs; through Freedom to Tinker, he created one of the field’s most influential forums for research-based public commentary on digital technology in public life. In public service, he brought technical credibility directly into government, serving as the first Chief Technologist of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and later as Deputy U.S. Chief Technology Officer in the White House. In these roles, he helped strengthen the government’s capacity to address privacy, security, consumer protection, and the societal implications of emerging technologies.
His role in AI policy is a particularly strong example of this foresight. At a time when artificial intelligence had not yet become the center of global policy debate, Felten helped frame it as a matter not only of innovation, but of governance, accountability, safety, and human oversight. His 2016 White House reports helped define an approach to AI that were remarkably prescient. They treated AI as a field requiring careful public stewardship, institutional preparedness, and technically informed policy — precisely the direction that serious AI governance has since taken.
What distinguishes Felten is his integrity and effectiveness as a bridge between the research community and the public interest. As one colleague noted:
Ed combines some of the strongest, deepest, and most creative engineering analyses of computer security and privacy, with enormous public policy impact. In Ed’s case, these two facets are inextricably linked. Ed is effective in public policy because of his deep technical capabilities. And in the public policy arena, Ed conducts serious scholarship, vs. the sort of well-intentioned dabbling that characterizes the efforts of most of the small number of computer scientists who venture into this realm at all.
Taken together, his work has aided policymakers directly, influenced major national debates, and inspired a generation of computer scientists to pursue research with immediate policy relevance. His record shows a career of exceptional breadth, continuing currency, and lasting impact.
ACM Fellows
USA - 2007
citation
For contributions to security and the public policy of information technology.